IR Web Report - Latest Comments in E-Proxy Part 37: Try this for fun

Re: E-Proxy Part 37: Try this for fun

Mike — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:24:26 -0000

perhaps not as discreet but then why not use a simple blogger or wordpress re-direct... heck there are so many ways to avoid this.

Re: E-Proxy Part 37: Try this for fun

Derek — Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:32:20 -0000

The problem with TinyUrl and its ilk is that sysadmins add these to rapidly growing lists of websites to block.
Still, custom made URL shorteners a two a ha'penny to create

Re: E-Proxy Part 37: Try this for fun

Dominic Jones — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:49:31 -0000

Eva,

Thomson didn't write the notice. They just host the site. And it is Urban Outfitters' meeting, so they have to take responsibility.

As much as I am critical of Thomson, I can't lay all of the blame at their door for this one. I'm not sure they would even have been aware that the company was going to use that URL. I've seen cases where redirects were in place for Thomson hosted materials.

Re: E-Proxy Part 37: Try this for fun

Eva — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:19:35 -0000

Actually the company that is hosting the proxy materials is Thomson Financial. They should know better than that. Sloppy work. Not urban outfitters fault.

Re: E-Proxy Part 37: Try this for fun

Dominic Jones — Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:46:20 -0000

OK. There are so many ways to avoid this scenario.

If they'd thought about it ahead of time, they could have -- for the princely sum of $4.95 to $8.95 -- registered a domain (e.g. urbanoutfitters-agm.com)and forwarded people to the longer URL. Anyone can do that. Seriously, *anyone.* No tech know-how required.

They could have redirected from something like urbanoutfitters.com/annualm... to the longer URL at no additional cost. A little bit of tech know-how required.

They could have used TinyURL. A 4-year-old can do that, but it might not be kosher for SEC filings. However, it's used in the UK for regulatory filings, so I don't see why not here.

They could have, they could have...

One thing they did right was to send people to their site rather than direct to www.proxyvote.com or one of the other voting sites.

Why the SEC allows links direct to the voting sites instead of via the proxy materials, I don't know because that was a big issue in the comment period. They didn't want people to get the proxy card ahead of getting the proxy materials to ensure people cast informed votes.

But by sending people to www.proxyvote.com under notice-and-access (which is what is now happening in most cases) Broadridge and others are essentially delivering the proxy card ahead of the disclosure materials. Yes, I know the materials are there at the same time, but proxyvote.com is set up to drive voting, not drive people to the proxy statement and annual report.

Huh?

Re: E-Proxy Part 37: Try this for fun

George — Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:42:46 -0000

Yikes, that is one ugly looking URL for Urban Outfitters. You would think a brand conscious retailer we know better than not at least include their name in the URL. Also, that comma at the end of the URL will trip up half the boomers that try to use it.

Re: E-Proxy Part 37: Try this for fun

Dennis Walsh — Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:50:19 -0000

Urban Outfitters

Re: E-Proxy Part 37: Try this for fun

Mark — Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:48:58 -0000

After mistyping it twice, I got Urban Outfitters.